Lekin, I never believed in oiling before.Behind her shiny hair, Chitrangada Singh reveals a secret combination.

On the podcast Let's Talk for Namitaa, Chitrangada Singh recently talked about her hair care regimen and credited oiling for improving the quality of her hair. "I never used to believe in oiling, lekin bahut farak padta, oiling is very, very important," she said. The quality of your hair has improved since I started using rosemary, pepper mint, almond oil, and teen cheezon ko mix karke mujhe diya hai kisni.IndianExpress.com contacted Dr. Bhawuk Dhir, Consultant Dermatology, PSRI Hospital, to verify the actor's claim. He concurred that oiling has advantages, "but with realistic expectations."According to Dr. Dhir, "regular hair oiling can be scientifically effective, but its impact varies from person to person." He explains that oils don't directly promote the growth of new hair by activating biological growth pathways. The main functions of oils are as protecting and emollients. They protect the hair shaft from friction and environmental harm, prevent breakage, lessen dryness, and seal in moisture," he says. During oil application, a light scalp massage may also promote improved blood circulation. Dr. Dhir continues, "The evidence is stronger for improved texture and reduced damage rather than dramatic hair growth, even though this creates a healthier scalp environment."  

Kerala HC wants to see The Kerala Story 2 after discovering that the teaser and trailer misrepresent the state.

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday (February 24, 2026) requested that the movie be shown to it on Wednesday, claiming that the teaser and trailer for The Kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond "wrongly portrays" the people of Kerala. Since Kerala is mentioned in the title by the filmmakers, who claim that the film tells a pan-Indian story, the concerns of the people of the State cannot be disregarded. Tensions within the community could result from this," it stated."You don't think the Court ought to see the film. "You want the question of whether this petition is a private or public litigation to be resolved," the court said. The Court made the observation during the hearing of three petitions from people who wanted to prevent the film's release and have the Central Board of Film Certification's (CBFC) certificate revoked because they believed the movie stigmatized and misrepresented Kerala, which could cause tensions and discord among communities. The Court noted that the petitioners' concerns seemed prima facie justified because the movie was being projected as "inspired by true events" and prominently carried the name of the state in its title, even though the sequels' plot had no real connection to Kerala. The Court then expressed its inclination to watch the film during the morning hearing. Therefore, it requested that the producer and the CBFC's legal representatives obtain guidance regarding the best time to screen the film for the Court. Additionally, the movie producers' attorney stated that the screening may go.  

The price of lodging at ITC Mementos, the location of Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda's wedding

NDTV has revealed that Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda have selected ITC Mementos as the location for their wedding, which is scheduled for February 26, 2026. The home is tucked away in the Aravalli highlands, 25 kilometers from Udaipur. Mementos by ITC Hotels Ekaaya is a perfect destination wedding location since it provides an opulent getaway from the congested lakes and forts of Udaipur. This is where a fairytale becomes a reality, with verdant hills in the background, blue skies overhead, and a festive atmosphere.In order to give fans a preview of the festivities, paparazzi accounts started sharing the first images of the wedding location on Instagram after the announcement. The couple has selected the lavish Mementos by ITC Hotels, Ekaaya Udaipur, as the setting for their private celebrations, according to those reports.For their wedding, Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda have selected a gorgeous boutique home nestled in the Aravalli hills, away from the bustle of Udaipur. The tranquil retreat, which is surrounded by expansive nature, provides visitors with a variety of tastefully furnished rooms and apartments.  

One Battle After Another wins in the BAFTA film awards in the United Kingdom.

One Battle is a dark comedy. After Another has won six BAFTA awards, including best film and best director for Paul Thomas Anderson, and has swept the top film honors in the United Kingdom. The movie won the top honors at the gala on Sunday night, defeating both the vampire thriller Sinners and the Shakespearean family tragedy Hamnet.The UK awards, formally known as the EE BAFTA Film Awards, frequently offer clues about the winners of Hollywood's Academy Awards, which take place on March 15 this year. In addition to winning accolades for directing, adapted screenplay, cinematography, and editing, One Battle After Another, an explosive picture about a gang of revolutionaries engaged in a violent fight with the state, also earned praise for Sean Penn's supporting role as an obsessive military officer. As he accepted the directing award, Anderson remarked, "This is very overwhelming and wonderful." In the film, the director used Nina Simone's statement, "I know what freedom is: It's no fear." "Let's continue creating without fear. It's a smart idea.With a record 16 Oscar nominations, Sinners took home the best original score, best supporting actress award for Wunmi Mosaku, and best original screenplay for writer and director Ryan Coogler. Hamnet took home two prizes, including best British film, while the gothic horror tale Frankenstein took home three. One of the strongest candidates for BAFTA's best director and non-English language film categories was The Voice of Hind Rajab, a documentary exposing Israel's horrific invasion on Gaza. Sentimental Value, however, took first place in the non-English language category.  

Review of the Assi film: Taapsee Pannu and Kani Kusruti feature in an urgent, necessary call to arms that is a must-see

No. This isn't possible. Not in Delhi, where it is dangerous to be out after sunset. Not in India, where even infants and elderly women are not spared by predators. When schoolteacher Parima (Kani Kusruti) is dragged into a car and brutally attacked by a group of men, Anubhav Sinha's Assi, which alludes to the number of rapes that occur in a minute, doesn't waste any time in dragging us into the depths of darkness. The hours of a night that turns into a nightmare begin when she returns to her modest middle-class home from a function at a colleague's residence, where her husband Vinay (played by Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub) and young son (Advik Jaiswal) are waiting.As a telling aside, the principal of Parima's school (Seema Pahwa, in a cameo) is reluctant to allow her to return to work because, in her own words, neither she nor the students are ready. The teenage boys in Parima's math class, who post offensive remarks on their WhatsApp groups, are just as complicit in the continuation of rape culture as the loud-mouthed supporters of the status quo who let monsters run amok. Even while the frequent use of the red screen verges dangerously close to being gimmicky, the entire movie is completely and purposefully in your face, with the directors obviously expecting that you would never be able to get it out of your head and heart. It serves as a mirror to people who refuse to recognise how difficult it is for women to be out on their own, whether they are in playgrounds, on public transportation, crossing streets, or even in their own homes. No location is secure.The verbal altercations between the rapists' lawyer (Satyajit Sharma), who is overseen by an experienced judge (Revathi), and the feisty Raavi (Taapsee Pannu, who rejoins Sinha after "Mulk" and "Thappad"), who defends Parima's case, may bring to mind Sinha's earlier films, which used the courtroom as a battlefield to stake out the ethical and moral ground that was quickly slipping from under our feet.  

The reception invitation for Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda's February 26 wedding has surfaced.

On February 26 of this year, actors Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna are set to tie the knot. According to several sources, the couple is getting married during a destination wedding in Udaipur, albeit the exact location has not yet been disclosed. On March 3, the couple will throw a wedding celebration in Hyderabad. The media is circulating an invitation to a wedding celebration that highlights the couple's journey together and their belief in celebrating with others who have shared in it. The invitation, which was sent on behalf of Deverakonda, includes information about the reception location and states that the festivities will start at 7 p.m.According to reports, in October of last year, Mandanna and Deverakonda were engaged in a secret ceremony in Hyderabad. The two didn't deny the engagement at any of the subsequent events they attended, but they also didn't make the announcement. Vijay was spotted encouraging and applauding Rashmika during the victory celebration of her film The Girlfriend. He was also seen kissing her hand in a video that went viral.The two initially collaborated on the Telugu movie Geetha Govindam (2018), which was a huge smash and made them one of the most adored on-screen duos in South cinema. Many people liked their chemistry. Both their professional relationship and fan conjecture were further strengthened when they reconnected in the 2019 film Dear Comrade. Rumors about their connection were fueled by social media posts, lavish gatherings, frequent holidays at comparable areas around the same time, and subtly endorsing each other's films.With his ground-breaking performance in Sandeep Reddy Vanga's Arjun Reddy (2017), Vijay Deverakonda became a household name and one of Telugu cinema's most intense and unorthodox leading males. He experimented with pan-Indian appeal with films like Liger (2022) and followed it up with commercial triumphs like Geetha Govindam (2018).  

The producer of the Vijay-starrer is allowed to drop their writ petition in the Jana Nayagan censorship dispute by the Madras High Court.

On Tuesday, February 10, 2026, the Madras High Court allowed the production company of the Vijay-starring film Jana Nayagan to withdraw a writ petition it had filed on January 6, 2026, asking the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to order the film to receive a U/A 16+ certificate within 24 hours.After Vijayan Subramanian, the attorney for KVN Productions LLP, sent a letter to the High Court Registry indicating that the production company had chosen to accept the CBFC chairman's referral to the nine-member revising committee, Justice P.T. Asha dismissed the writ suit as withdrawn.The legal obstacles preventing the CBFC from returning the film to the revision committee for a new assessment of whether it should receive a U (universal), U/A (under adult guidance), or A (adults only) certification have been removed by the court's approval to drop the petition. Due to legal issues, the film's January 9 release date was postponed by more than a month. On December 18, 2025, the producer submitted the film for certification through the tatkal method, and on December 19, 2025, a five-member examining committee viewed the film. On December 22, 2025, the producer was notified that, if specific excisions were made, the examining committee had suggested a U/A 16+ certification. On December 24, 2025, the production company submitted the edited film to the CBFC after accepting the recommendation and making all the recommended excisions.Despite the film's numerous allusions to the military, one of the examining committee members complained to the chairman of the CBFC in Mumbai about the lack of an authority on Army-related matters. Therefore, on December 29, 2025, the chairman of the CBFC paused the proceedings.  

Rajesh Khanna accused Salman Khan of betraying him by offering to labour for free in order to purchase his mansion, saying, "Mujhe sadak par lana chata hai."

As India's "first superstar," Rajesh Khanna led an extravagant existence. Between 1969 and 1972, he set an unprecedented record of 15 consecutive solo hit films. During the height of his fame, he amassed substantial riches and properties. He even bought a mansion with a view of the sea on Carter Road, one of Mumbai's most desirable streets, and christened it Aashirwad. The cottage quickly rose to prominence and came to represent his unmatched fame.Aashirwad was purportedly purchased by Rajesh Khanna from fellow actor Rajendra Kumar in the early 1970s for about Rs 3.5 lakh. Author Gautam Chintamani writes in Dark Star: The Loneliness of Being Rajesh Khanna that after Khanna relocated to Aashirwad, "the facade of being a king was complete."  

The Bollywood movie Battle of Galwan has caused controversy due to its factual distortion experts claim that a country's holy area cannot be impacted by over-the-top drama.

On December 27, main actor Salman Khan released the trailer for the Indian film Battle of Galwan, which is set to be released in April 2026 and purports to be based on the 2020 fighting between Indian and Chinese troops in the Galwan region. The clip sparked outrage on the internet on Monday. Chinese internet users frequently make fun of Salman Khan, who is best known to Chinese audiences as the lead actor in Bajrangi Bhaijaan, for portraying parts that seem too unbeatable, with stories that are too straightforward and excessive visual effects that make the drama seem surreal.Salman Khan plays Colonel Bikkumalla Santosh Babu in the movie, a role that Indian media said attracted Bollywood's attention due to his alleged crucial part in the 2020 Galwan Valley conflict. Bollywood films, at most, offer an emotionally charged and entertaining picture, but no amount of cinematic exaggeration can change history or undermine the PLA's resolve to protect China's sovereign land, according to a Chinese scholar on Monday.The Hindustan Times reported on Sunday that the trailer opens with Salman's voice giving a speech while instructing his soldiers on how to combat the "enemy." He is then shown in the video approaching the "enemy," with his soldiers standing next to him. He is then shown clinging to a stick while the "enemy" rushes in their direction. Salman's character strikes someone with the stick as the video comes to a close. On the other hand, some online users questioned whether the movie had imitated a sequence from Game of Thrones.The movie has also sparked additional controversy on the internet, with users pointing to things like extras' outfits and looks, actors' hairstyles that don't fit their military roles or the storyline's suggestion of extreme cold, and—most importantly—a depiction of events that isn't true. About 200 Indian soldiers valiantly defended their land against a force of 1,200 Chinese soldiers on June 15, 2020, according to certain local media, notably India Today, which has promoted the movie as being based on the events that occurred between Indian and Chinese troops in the Galwan region.  

What's Trending Globally

Asia

News 2366

Australia/New-Zealand

News 45

Canada

News 15

China

News 50

Europe

News 40

France

News 1

Gulf

News 11

India

News 3460

Pakistan

News 22

Russia

News 20

Ukraine

News 0

United Kingdom

News 52

Actor Sivaji apologises "sincerely" for remarks made on the attire of actresses.

Following intense criticism for comments he made on women's attire at the pre-release event of the upcoming movie Dhandoraa, Telugu actor Sivaji has publicly apologised. Social media users and several members of the film industry reacted strongly to the actor's remarks, which were generally condemned as uninvited and moralising.Sivaji posted a video message on X apologising for his remarks made during the Monday event. "I should not have used unparliamentary words," he said. I wasn't talking about all women. I just mentioned that if actors dressed carefully, they might not feel uncomfortable. Although I didn't want to disparage anyone, I truly apologise for using such language. Sivaji posted a video message on X apologising for his remarks made during the Monday event. "I should not have used unparliamentary words," he said. I wasn't talking about all women. I just mentioned that if actors dressed carefully, they might not feel uncomfortable. Although I didn't want to disparage anyone, I truly apologise for using such language."I ask all heroines not to wear revealing outfits," the actor remarked in Telugu. Please wear gowns or sarees that completely conceal your body. Wearing a saree or full clothing is more beautiful than flaunting one's physical prowess.  

Day 17 box office receipts for Dhurandhar (LIVE) The Ranveer Singh and Akshaye Khanna film hits Rs 550 crore, grows on its third Sunday, and is unaffected by Avatar Fire and Ash.

It made more money in the second week—Rs 253 crore—than it did in the first. This is quite uncommon. In the first week, it earned Rs 207.25 crore. The movie started off slowly on the third Friday after finishing the second week, and it may now start to decline. It earned Rs 22.5 crore on Friday, day 15. It made Rs 34.25 crore on the third Saturday, growing by over 52%. And now, Sunday, day 17, has begun on a respectable note as well. It might wind up earning at least as much as it did on Saturday.The movie has made Rs 36.47 crore so far. The current total collection is Rs553.72 crore. On its third day, Sunday, "Avatar Fire And Ash" has now earned Rs 22.82 crore.So far, the film has earned Rs 36.47 crore. As of right now, Rs553.72 crore has been collected. "Avatar Fire And Ash" has already made Rs 22.82 crore on Sunday, its third day.  

Following Raj Nidimoru's marriage to Samantha Ruth Prabhu, his ex-wife Shhyamali De writes a long letter:

Samantha Ruth Prabhu and Raj Nidimoru tied the knot at the Isha Yoga Centre in Coimbatore on December 1. Everyone was ecstatic and sent congratulations as soon as their wedding photos were released. However, people were once again quite interested in Raj Nidimoru's ex-wife Shhyamali De's response to the latest development in his life. Even though she made no explicit mention of anything, rumours were fuelled by a mysterious note she wrote the day before and the day after the wedding. A few days after Samantha and Raj's nuptials, Shhyamali De posted a long message on social media. Find out what it's all about by reading on.Shhyamali De thanked everyone who sent her well wishes during her time of need in a series of Instagram Stories on Thursday. She said that she was upset to learn that her Jyotish guru had been given a Stage 4 cancer diagnosis. Additionally, Shhyamali De asked her "Instafam" to "keep this space clean." "I appreciate all of your thoughtfulness, including the blessings, kind words, and well wishes. "After a restless night of arguing and tossing and turning, I came to the conclusion that it would be churlish and disrespectful to ignore all the good that is coming my way. I've been meditating on twin hearts for a long time. "Blessing Mother Earth and all people and beings with peace, love, forgiveness, hope, light, joy, loving-kindness, goodwill, and the will to do good is part of the meditation," she said.  

Despite Ranveer Singh's apologies, a second complaint was made against him for imitating daivas and offending the Tulu community's sacred feelings by discussing Rishab Shetty's Kantara.

Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh was accused of violating the Tulu customary spirit-worship depicted in Rishab Shetty's Kantara flicks, according to a complaint filed by Bengaluru-based High Court counsel Prashanth Methal. This is the second complaint made against the actor, who in this case expressed regret. Also Read: Rishab Shetty had discouraged Ranveer Singh against copying Daivas before he did it on the stage at IFFI.The Hindu also stated that counsel Prashanth Methal submitted a formal complaint at the High Grounds Police Station alleging that the actor had mocked the revered daiva custom during the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) closing ceremony in Goa on November 28.The complaint furthered claimed that Ranveer had done a parody of the Panjuluri/Guliga daiva who is worshipped in the coastal Karnataka region. The counsel was also cited noting that the performance was nasty, insulting, and hilarious and a huge source of injury to the Hindu feelings particularly among the Tulu population. The complaint additionally alleged that the Ranveer dubbed the daiva a female spirit, which the advocate regarded to as blasphemous and had been purposefully disrespectful. He instructed the police to start prosecuting Ranveer.Ranveer has responded by apologising to the netizens on social media, after a series of criticisms on the internet after the viral video of him copying the daivas. “My intention was to highlight Rishab's incredible performance in the film. Actor to actor, I know how much it would take to perform that particular sequence in the way that he did, for which he has my utmost admiration,” he wrote.In addition, Ranveer apologised for hurting people's feelings and said, "I have always deeply respected every culture, tradition, and belief in our country." If I've harmed anyone's sensibilities, I genuinely apologise.” The behaviour that disrespected the Tulu community happened when Ranveer went to meet with Rishab at the closing ceremony of IFFi, and replicated the daivas although the Kannada actor urged him not to.  

Veteran performer Asrani is receiving a ton of tributes, including

Indian actor Govardhan Asrani passed away last week at the age of 84, and tributes are flooding in. According to his management, Asrani, who goes by his last name, passed away in a hospital in Mumbai city on Monday after a brief illness, as reported by BBC Hindi. Asrani performed in over 300 films during the course of a career that lasted more than 50 years, the majority of them were comedic. He played an eccentric jailer in the 1975 hit Sholay, which stands out as one of his most memorable roles."Asrani ji, the person who made everyone smile, is no longer with us. In a statement shared on the actor's social media accounts, his family wrote, "His passing is an irreparable loss for both Hindi cinema and our hearts." On Monday, family members and close friends attended the performance of his last rites. Asrani was referred to as a "versatile artist" and "gifted entertainer" by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi."In particular, his remarkable performances brought laughter and joy to innumerable lives. Modi commented on X, "His contribution to Indian cinema will always be cherished." Asrani was born in 1941 in Rajasthan, a state in western India. In the 1960s, he studied acting at the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) after starting his career as a voice actor at the state-run All India Radio. Although he made his Hindi cinema debut in 1967, he gained global recognition for his role as a clumsy jailer in the 1975 film Sholay, which was intended to be a caricature of Adolf Hitler.Earlier this year, Asrani recounted his preparation for the part in an interview with BBC Hindi. He stated that the jailer "thinks he is very smart but isn't," according to the film's director Ramesh Sippy and writer Salim-Javed. In the 1980s and 1990s, Asrani was frequently featured on television programs that were broadcast on Doordarshan, the state broadcaster. In the 1980s hit series Natkhat Narad, he portrayed the Hindu scholar Narad Muni. In addition, he directed a number of Gujarati and Hindi movies. From subtle situational humor to overblown performances, the actor became linked with comedic roles in popular movies. However, he thought he was more than a comedian.  

Roopa Ganguly tears down on Pankaj Dheer's death, names Mahabharat co-star ‘most attractive man on the set after…’

Actor Roopa Ganguly, who played Draupadi in BR Chopra's Mahabharat (1988-1990), lavished compliments as she remembered her co-star Pankaj Dheer (who essayed the character of Karna). Roopa said in an interview with NDTV that Pankaj "was the most handsome man on the set after Nitish Bharadwaj." He was also described as a "reserved person" by her. In addition, Roopa conveyed her shock and sympathy at Pankaj's passing.After a fight with cancer, Pankaj passed away at the age of 68, according to news agency PTI. Roopa discussed him and said that she was unaware of his poor health. "I think we had a text conversation around a year ago. However, he never discussed his sickness with me," Roopa sobbed. Despite meeting Pankaj "years ago," she said that they continued to communicate "over texts on and off."She walked down memory lane, remembering their interactions on the Mahabharat film sets. After Nitish Bharadwaj, Pankaj Dheer was the most attractive male on the set. I would text him and refer to him as "my most handsome friend." 'Handsome' was a term he was aware of. However, he is a really polite, well-mannered man. Firoz Khan, who portrayed Arjun, and Puneet Issar, who played Duryodhan, were a little mischievous (chulbule). However, Pankaj was always quiet," she remarked.Pankaj was well-known for his roles as King Shivdutt in the fantasy drama Chandrakanta and Karna in BR Chopra's Mahabharat. "He died this morning from cancer." Producer Ashoke Pandit was quoted by PTI as stating, "He had been in and out of the hospital in the past months." On Wednesday night, Pankaj's final ceremonies were held at the Pawan Hans crematorium. Among those who paid their final respects at the crematorium were Salman Khan, Sidharth Malhotra, Arbaaz Khan, Puneet Issar, and Mika Singh. His son, Nikitin Dheer, an actor, and wife, Anita Dheer, survive him.  

KBC 17: A child who is "overconfident" enters the hot seat and requests that Amitabh Bachchan not explain the regulations; they depart without receiving any compensation. "Mujhe, rules vules pata hai.

Presenting a special kids' edition, Amitabh Bachchan's Kaun Banega Crorepati 17 showcases intelligent young candidates who frequently dazzle spectators with their charm and humor. A recent show, however, garnered notice for a different reason: a young participant's overconfident demeanor and somewhat impolite remarks toward Big B went viral. The video has already gone viral on social media, and the child eventually left without receiving any cash.Since Amitabh entered the hot seat, the child has been seen speaking brutally to him in a video that has gone viral on social media. The child, Ishit Bhatt, is a fifth-grade student from Gandhinagar, Gujarat.A fifth-grade student from Gandhinagar, Gujarat named Ishit Bhatt participated in the Junior edition of KBC 17. After he said to Amitabh Bachchan, "Mere ko rules pata hai, isliye aap mereko abhi rules samjhane mat baithna" (I know the rules, so don't start explaining them to me right now), his segment swiftly became the buzz of social media. Even Big B looked momentarily surprised as the audience gasped.Ishit's demands and interruptions persisted as the game started. The boy interrupted Amitabh before he could complete reading the questions, saying, "Arre option daalo!" (Come on, show me the possibilities!) & "Sir ek kya, lekin lock karo, uss mein chaar lock lagado!" (Sir, make sure to lock it with four locks, not just one. Many were annoyed by his arrogance, while others found it amusing.Ishit firmly selected Ayodhya Kanda, which turned out to be incorrect, when asked, "What is the name of the first Kanda of the Valmiki Ramayana?" The right response was Bala Kanda. Amitabh Bachchan kindly remarked, "Kabhi kabhi bachhe over confidence mein galti kar dete hai" (Sometimes children make mistakes due to overconfidence) when he lost all of his gains.With thousands of views, the episode's footage went popular on X (previously Twitter). The boy's tone was criticized by many people as being impolite and haughty. An individual commented, "Arrogance got schooled." Perhaps the parents will learn now. "Knowledge without manners is useless," another person said. Others, on the other hand, defended the boy, claiming that social media was being too harsh on a minor and that he was just overexcited.  

Day 12 (LIVE) box office receipts for "Kantara: Chapter 1": The Rishab Shetty movie, which has already made over Rs 430 crore, begins the second Monday slowly.

How "Kantara: Chapter 1" has dominated the box office. Despite having a massive opening of over Rs 60 crore on day one in all languages, the Rishab Shetty-directed film, which also starred him, Rukmini Vasanth, and other performers, gradually started to decline. It made the most of its October 2 release date, which was a national holiday because of Gandhi Jayanti and Dussehra. However, the movie continued to make around Rs 20 crore even in the days that followed. It has grown well on its second weekend.Rishab Shetty, the mastermind of Kantara, posted BTS images of the film, and the post quickly gained popularity. The BTS photographs were posted on Instagram, and within three hours, they had over 1.5 lakh likes."A swollen leg and an exhausted body were present during the climax shoot, but now millions of people watch and admire the climax." Only the blessings of the heavenly spirit that we believe in made this possible. Sincere gratitude to all of our supporters," Rishab Shetty wrote beside the photos. On October 2, Kantara: A Legend Chapter 1, a prequel to the popular first movie, was made available. The film made ₹478.65 crore net in 11 days in India. Sacnilk claims that the film has already made ₹600 crore worldwide. According to reports, Kantara 2 had a ₹125 crore budget.Three years have passed since Kantara, which was made for a mere ₹16 crore, became an enormous success. Globally, the folklore drama brought in ₹407.82 crore. The images that went viral depict Rishab's swelling legs during the climax shoot, which has grown to be one of the most moving moments for fans all around the country.  

Company Behind 'Bigg Boss Kannada' Takes Legal Action Against Premises Sealing and Contestant Eviction by Pollution Control Board

VELS Studio And Entertainment Private Limited, the host of the reality show 'Big Boss Kannada' at its Bidadi location, has approached the Karnataka High Court to contest an October 6 order from the State Pollution Control Board that mandated the immediate closure of the studio premises. The petition claims that the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board's action is arbitrary, illegal, and lacks jurisdiction, authority, and compliance with due process.It indicates that the closure order dated 06.10.2025 was carried out on the following day, 07.10.2025 (Tuesday), concerning the petitioner's property located in Bidadi, Ramanagara District, which contains the legitimate operations of VELS Studios and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. The petition claims that the order was issued with complete disregard for natural justice principles, denying the petitioner a chance to be heard.According to the plea, the respondents have tried to suddenly stop ongoing television production activities, including filming the well-known reality show "BIG BOSS", while acting beyond their authority and with a clear intention to harm. Moreover, it is claimed that the timing and rush involved in passing and executing the order—occurring as they did at the same time as the launch and public broadcast of that show—demonstrate a conscious and intentional effort to disrupt the Petitioner's legitimate business activities and impede its commercial operations. Additionally, the plea argues that the order lacks details regarding the supposed pollutant, including its characteristics, concentration, and the method by which this pollution is alleged to have happened. Without these specifics, the order turns indistinct, capricious, and lacks justification. Moreover, the Respondent authority has not documented even minimal findings as mandated by law for a quasi-judicial order, thus breaching fundamental principles of natural justice.an industrial establishment or factory. According to Section 2(d) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, an "environmental pollutant" is defined as any substance that exists at a concentration detrimental to human life. Data from laboratory or clinical tests must necessarily support such a finding. In the current case, no such data or test report has been used as a basis. The Respondent's actions have been based solely on assumptions, which has made the impugned order arbitrary and unsustainable.The plea requests that the closure order be set aside. Meanwhile, it is seeking a stay on the operation of the order from October 6 and a direction to the respondents not to disrupt the daily business carried out at those premises.