Government should review its stand on keeping Ram Temple Trust outside preview of RTI says CPI(M) MP John Brittas

CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas has urged the Union government to reconsider its position that the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust does not come under the ambit of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In a letter addressed to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Brittas argued that institutions enjoying immense public trust and handling large public donations should also maintain the highest standards of transparency and accountability.The demand comes amid an ongoing controversy surrounding alleged irregularities in the handling of donations received by the Ram Temple Trust. Brittas maintained that public confidence in such institutions can be strengthened through greater openness rather than reduced oversight. He said that bringing the Trust under the RTI framework would improve public accountability without affecting its religious functions.In his letter, Brittas referred to the Trust's unique legal status. He pointed out that following the 2019 Supreme Court judgment in the Ayodhya dispute, the Central government constituted the Trust through a gazette notification, transferred the acquired land to it, and initially nominated most of its members. According to him, these factors indicate substantial government involvement in the Trust's creation.

Brittas also questioned the reasoning behind a 2025 decision of the Central Information Commission, which had ruled that the Trust was not a "public authority" under the RTI Act. He argued that the Commission's conclusion relied heavily on the Ministry of Home Affairs' stand and requested the Centre to reconsider its position before the matter receives further judicial scrutiny.The Union government's existing position is that the Trust functions independently and is neither controlled nor funded by the government, making it outside the scope of the RTI Act. The Ministry of Home Affairs has stated that the Trust is autonomous and manages its affairs without government interference, a view that has also been reflected in the Central Information Commission's ruling.The issue has sparked renewed debate over the balance between institutional autonomy and public accountability. While supporters of the Trust's current status argue that religious bodies should remain independent of government oversight, advocates of greater transparency believe that organizations managing significant public donations should be subject to disclosure obligations under the RTI Act. The matter could see further legal and political developments in the coming weeks.